Advertising on small publishing projects
Online publishingThe Canned Coffee site is a sort of like a wooden box with a toilet in which we can contain Mr. Cady and his coffee madness. However, on the business side of things it's a laboratory of online publishing experiments for us here at Chin Music Press. It's an experiment in selling electronic publications, it's an experiment in using advertisements on a site, and it's another piece of our grander experiment in building an online CMP-based network.
Putting ads on a site is understandably a big deal for a grass-roots type organization. Will it undermine the message of the site? Will it drive away readers annoyed by anything commercial? Will it muck up and overwhelm the content in undesirable ways?
With these questions in mind, we applied and were accepted into the Yahoo beta publishers program. We decided to go with Yahoo ads (over Google) on the Canned Coffee site for several reasons:
1. You have a great deal of control over the look of the ad. The one ad we do feature on the main page and individual archives blends in fairly seamlessly with the design and doesn't disrupt the flow of the content. But it's also not hidden to the point of undermining the fundamental purpose of putting the ad there.
2. The ads tend to be relevant. They are usually about coffee (especially on the review pages). Which is a good thing because our site is about coffee. As it turns out, coffee ads also tend to be interesting since there aren't too many shady companies connected with selling coffee. Chances are the site behind a coffee ad has some interesting content.
3. The Yahoo backend is nicer than the Google Adsense backend. It's cleaner, easier to use and quicker at getting you information on earnings and generating reports. It's also more real-time than Google, which can delay reporting by several hours. The click-through rate also seems to be higher. For example, we had one click generate $1.38. That's like three days of food for Bruce and me.
This all begs the question: Why did we put ads on the site in the first place? In a company as small as we are with profit margins this slim, any way to pull in a few extra bucks to cover basic online expenses — hosting, servers, stats software, etc. — is a great plus. If we can at the very least recoup server and hosting expenses for our current projects, then that's more money to put towards new projects and books. And if we can generate that money without turning people off, then that's a good thing.
Apparently telling you guys to go and click the ads on the site is a big no-no in the Rule Book of Yahoo Ads. So I'll just leave you with this: if you want us to feed David in his box, investigating products that may appear on our site is one way to peripherally provide for the gruel which we periodically throw at him with a shovel.
EDIT (10-24-05): Just a quick note of clarification: When I say "We decided to go with Yahoo ads (over Google) on the Canned Coffee site for several reasons:" I do not mean to imply the reasons which followed are why we used Yahoo over Google.
I probably should have written, "We decided to go with Yahoo ads over Google ads. The reasons we decided to put any ads at all on the Canned Coffee site are:"
It's true, Yahoo and Google ads both look almost identical and they're both usually very relevant to the content. Yahoo, in my opinion, does have a nicer backend but other than that (and an ostensibly higher per-click-pay) they're virtually identical services.
I just noticed you switched from Yahoo ads to Google on the canned coffee site. Is there a particular reason Google seemed like a better deal?
Eric at January 23, 2006 02:46 PM
Hi Eric,
Yes, actually I've been meaning to do a quick entry on why we did that switch. If you look, the individual entries are still Yahoo ads, while the front page is Google. We were getting really irrelevant results from the Yahoo ads -- advertisements for uniforms and other non-coffee related items -- and felt it looked too kitschy. Having interesting ads on Coffee at least blends with the content.
Google was simply giving us more relevant returns so they get the front-page billing now.
However, in Yahoo's favor they did respond to feedback I sent them about the service. And, even though they're on the second-tier pages, the yahoo ads are still brining in more money than the google's on the front page. Go figure.
Craig Mod at January 23, 2006 07:57 PM

We've been hosting with ICD for over 3 years now with no hiccups. Super reliable, cheap and excellent tech support.
Curing Japan's America Addiction
Do You Know, the book
Goodbye Madame Butterfly
Kuhaku, the book
Last of the Red Hot Poppas
Book fairs
Bookstores
Business
Buzztracking
Circular file
Coffee Mondays
Copyright issues
Design
English usage
Hitotoki
Japan Infusion
Japan market
Life in Japan
Life in the US
Marketing
Media issues
Midwifery
Music Fridays
Noteworthy Publishers
Online publishing
Paper art
Readings
Reviews
Small press watch
The digital shift
The industry
The lit world
Things literary and otherwise
Working with printers
Writing
Art Space gives Guardian the lowdown
Sleep and productivity
New York Art Beat!
Art and neighborhoods
Art Space Tokyo Tokyo launch party TONIGHT!
Things literary and otherwise X
Envisioning Japan at Brooklyn Museum
Transpacific metamorphoses
Worst corporate word of the day
Chin Music Press at Hugo House tonight
Art Space Tokyo — Tokyo release party!
Confessions of a canned-coffee collector
CMP & 101Tokyo
The Butterfly quickie book tour in pictures
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004





